Ascending and Descending Triangles

In today's chart pattern lesson we will be discussing the ascending and descending triangles. These two chart patterns are similar as they both suggest a continuation of the underlying trend, that is, an ascending triangle formation is bullish while the descending triangle formation is bearish. It should be pointed out that both the above two formations can be reversals as well, therefore you must wait for the breakout. To overview Symmetrical triangles, please click here.

ascending triangle

Ascending Triangles

  • Trend: To qualify for as a continuation pattern, an established trend should exist.
  • Top Horizontal Line: To form the top horizontal line there must be at least two reaction highs, in the above example, points 2 and 4. The highs do not have to be exact however the more the better. The highs and the subsequent lows should be some distance from each other.
  • Lower Ascending Trend:Again at least two reaction lows are required to form the lower ascending triangle, each low should be higher than the last, points 1, 3 and 5 . The trend is not valid if the following low is lower.
  • Duration: the average duration should be between one and three months.
  • Volume: Usually, as the pattern develops, volume should decrease before, ideally, increases during the breakout.
  • Price Target: Like the symmetrical triangle, the price target is calculated the furthest distance between the top horizontal line and the lower ascending line. Targets are only meant to be used as guidelines and other aspects of technical analysis should also be employed when deciding when to sell.

descending triangle

Descending Triangles

  • Trend: To qualify for as a continuation pattern, an established trend should exist.
  • Top Descending Line: there must be two reaction highs to form the trend line, and they must be separated by some distance points 1 and 4.
  • Lower Horizontal Trend: Again, there must be at least two reaction lows points 2 and 3.
  • Duration: As Above
  • Volume:As Above
  • Price Target: As Above

For further information on descending triangles, please click here.

 

Put in your contact details below and you will get emailed a username and password for a free 7 day trial.

First Name  *

Last Name  *

Email  *

Phone  *

How did you find us?  *

Disclaimer  *

 I agree

Privacy

CFD analysis, Forex Education, FX Trading, cfds, Forex Trader, SPI, Forex Education
Forex Education, CFD trading strategies, CFD analysis, What is a CFD,Forex Trading
 
Cfd trading, Forex Education, What is a CFD, CFD trading strategies, CFD analysis
FX Report, CFD Report, Forex Education  

Combined Trades
(Index, FX and Share CFDs)

2011
133.30%*

2010
89.68%*

2009
253.45%*

 

All figures based on a starting bank of  $10,000 on the 1st January each year.

For all trade details to recent date click here Past Performances

1300 262 449

CFDs  l  Fx  l Indices   l Trading Insights

TRUMarkets CFDs
What are CFDs
CFDs Services
Package Details
  TRUMarkets Forex
What is Forex
Forex Services
Package Details
  TRUMarkets Indices
What are Indices
Indices Services
Package Details
  Trading insights
Forex
Index Trading
Free Trial
 

Phone: 1300 262 449  
Email: info@trumarkets.com.au
Level 50, 120 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000  
Level 12, 95 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000

*Asterisk – This is based upon a starting bank of $10,000 in September 2009. These results are hypothetical trading results. The entry and exit prices quoted in these results were the live market prices at the time advisory communications were sent to clients. The exact price at which clients traded these recommendations will vary, as will the size of the position. These are some of the limitations of relying on hypothetical results. Equity CFD results are net of 0.1% brokerage, and spreads have been taken into consideration for Forex & Index CFD trades. Please note that fees, commissions, and spreads vary between brokers, and clients actual result may vary from these hypothetical results due to differing trading costs. Please be aware that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.